Loading

[New Soln] BUSN115 Assignments Week 3: Concept Connection

Rubric

BUSN115.Week 3: New Concept Connection Rubric
BUSN115.Week 3: New Concept Connection Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
Global Environment

16 to >14.0 pts

Excellent
Student provided an excellent assessment of advantages and disadvantages for small U.S. businesses competing in today’s global markets.

14 to >10.0 pts

Competent
Student provided a competent assessment of advantages and disadvantages for small U.S. businesses competing in today’s global markets.

10 to >6.0 pts

Fair
Student provided a fair assessment of advantages and disadvantages for small U.S. businesses competing in today’s global markets.

6 to >1.0 pts

Poor
Student provided a poor assessment of advantages and disadvantages for small U.S. businesses competing in today’s global markets.

1 to >0 pts

Unacceptable
Student provided an unacceptable assessment of advantages and disadvantages for small U.S. businesses competing in today’s global markets.
16 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome BM.UGB.BUSN115.Global Environment

Assess how businesses operate domestically and globally.
threshold: 3.0 pts

4 pts

Excellent: Student provided an excellent assessment of advantages and disadvantages for small U.S. businesses competing in today’s global markets.

3 pts

Competent: Student provided a competent assessment of advantages and disadvantages for small U.S. businesses competing in today’s global markets.

2 pts

Fair: Student provided a fair assessment of advantages and disadvantages for small U.S. businesses competing in today’s global markets.

1 pts

Poor: Student provided a poor assessment of advantages and disadvantages for small U.S. businesses competing in today’s global markets.

0 pts

Unacceptable: Student provided an unacceptable assessment of advantages and disadvantages for small U.S. businesses competing in today’s global markets.
4 pts
Ethics and Values

16 to >14.0 pts

Excellent
Student provided an excellent examination and example of how companies integrate ethics and values with business strategy and objectives through corporate social responsibility.

14 to >10.0 pts

Competent
Student provided a competent examination and example of how companies integrate ethics and values with business strategy and objectives through corporate social responsibility.

10 to >6.0 pts

Fair
Student provided a fair examination and example of how companies integrate ethics and values with business strategy and objectives through corporate social responsibility.

6 to >1.0 pts

Poor
Student provided a poor examination and example of how companies integrate ethics and values with business strategy and objectives through corporate social responsibility.

1 to >0 pts

Unacceptable
Student provided an unacceptable examination and example of how companies integrate ethics and values with business strategy and objectives through corporate social responsibility.
16 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome BM.UGB.BUSN115.Ethics and Values

Examine how ethics and values integrate with corporate strategy and objectives.
threshold: 3.0 pts

4 pts

Excellent: Student provided an excellent examination and example of how companies integrate ethics and values with business strategy and objectives through corporate social responsibility.

3 pts

Competent: Student provided a competent examination and example of how companies integrate ethics and values with business strategy and objectives through corporate social responsibility.

2 pts

Fair: Student provided a fair examination and example of how companies integrate ethics and values with business strategy and objectives through corporate social responsibility.

1 pts

Poor: Student provided a poor examination and example of how companies integrate ethics and values with business strategy and objectives through corporate social responsibility.

0 pts

Unacceptable: Student provided an unacceptable examination and example of how companies integrate ethics and values with business strategy and objectives through corporate social responsibility.
4 pts
Leadership

16 to >14.0 pts

Excellent
Student provided an excellent analysis of how autocratic, democratic, or free-reign leadership style affects the business environment.

14 to >10.0 pts

Competent
Student provided a competent analysis of how autocratic, democratic, or free-reign leadership style affects the business environment.

10 to >6.0 pts

Fair
Student provided a fair analysis of how autocratic, democratic, or free-reign leadership style affects the business environment.

6 to >1.0 pts

Poor
Student provided a poor analysis of how autocratic, democratic, or free-reign leadership style affects the business environment.

1 to >0 pts

Unacceptable
Student provided an unacceptable analysis of how autocratic, democratic, or free-reign leadership style affects the business environment.
16 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome BM.UGB.BUSN115.Leadership

Analyze how various leadership styles affect the business environment.
threshold: 3.0 pts

4 pts

Excellent: Student provided an excellent analysis of how autocratic, democratic, or free-reign leadership style affects the business environment.

3 pts

Competent: Student provided a competent analysis of how autocratic, democratic, or free-reign leadership style affects the business environment.

2 pts

Fair: Student provided a fair analysis of how autocratic, democratic, or free-reign leadership style affects the business environment.

1 pts

Poor: Student provided a poor analysis of how autocratic, democratic, or free-reign leadership style affects the business environment.

0 pts

Unacceptable: Student provided an unacceptable analysis of how autocratic, democratic, or free-reign leadership style affects the business environment.
4 pts
Support